Your browser does not support JavaScript, Please enable it.
  Top » Catalog
Keyword Search   
Log In |  Cart Contents
Home
Show Finder
Titles A-Z
Authors A-Z
Search by Cast Size
Search by Performance Group
Search by Theme
Search by Genre
Multiple Criteria Search
New and Featured Titles
Recent Acquisitions
New to our 2012/2013 Catalog
New to our 2011/2012 Catalog
Featured Plays
Planning Your Production
Important Things to Know
Licensing Information
Producing a Musical
Cuttings
Complete a Royalty Application
Meet Our Authors
Author Bios
Authors A-Z
Articles and Interviews
For Our Customers
Free Sound Effects
Free Posters A-Z
Script Excerpts
Music Clips
About Us
Contact Us
Order a Free Catalog
Affiliates and Other Links
FAQs
Submissions

Notes of a Lucky Playwright


By William Glennon

At the end of Stephen Sondheim’s Sunday in the Park With George the artist is alone on stage, staring at a blank canvas with an intensity that reveals both anguish and joy. His final words? “So many possibilities.”

No comparison to Sondheim or Seurat intended, but I do share the same mixed feelings of anguish and joy from my own experience of staring at the blank paper, fully aware that it's up to me to fill it.

I started writing plays during my years at the Pittsburgh Playhouse, where at first I was an actor and director, and then also in charge of the theater for young people, the Playhouse Jr. Under this banner we produced five plays a season which were mounted with a professionalism rarely seen at that time in theater for young people, offering our audiences a splendid introduction to the world of make-believe.

Published plays that met our standards and needs were limited. Children’s theater was just emerging from the “Enter two daisies dancing” era, and was trying to shake off its traditional overly moralistic tone. After a few seasons we had performed our way through what I felt were the best of them.

Up against the need for material to fill our heavy schedule I dared to think of myself as a possible provider. Well, I reasoned, I’ve got a typewriter and a stack of paper. There was the hungry audience and the merry band of players waiting, and, very encouragingly, a producer and board of directors who understood the importance of taking the long view in creating a theater where eager audiences will fill the seats long into the future. So, why not? Why not indeed! Hard to believe that at the time I didn’t realize my great good fortune, my unique situation. I was blessed that I worked in an environment that supported my mostly self-instructed education as an author of plays for children, where the exceptional ability of the company made up in our productions for the weaknesses that I had to learn to avoid as I wrote my way through my first efforts.

What did I have to learn? Lots. I enrolled in a graduate theater survey course, and discovered something more about dramatic structure, other than what I had instinctively understood, starting with the Greeks, but really seeing the light, ironically, turned on by Ibsen, not famous for his influence on authors of children’s plays. Ibsen taught me the constant that transcends catagories of theater, there is a theory of structure, which adhered to or departed from is the basis upon which plays should be built. Seurat could open himself to find new ways to build his profound canvases as long as he had a real understanding of the traditional craft of the artist and of optic and color theory. I had to learn the dramatist’s equivilent of that grounding in my craft.

Our troup was flexible, and readily available, which offered me the opportunity during a long run, to contemplate, as I observed audience response, changes in the script. I could write the new material, rehearse the cast and see the result at the next proformance. We all enjoyed improving the play and were reminded of the old saw “A play isn’t written, it's rewritten.”

Exposure of my efforts to a wider audience occured through publication. The Playhouse started a publishing arm but before too long turned my scripts over to the Coach House Press in Chicago, whose catalog gave my work much wider distribution. Again I made changes in the scripts—dressing up for company, so to speak.

About this time the Playhouse years came to an end. I found myself in mid-coast Maine where I very soon helped establish an “Artist in the Classroom” organization, new to Maine schools then. The program gave me the opportunity to explore the use of theater techniques as teaching tools. At first I kept an imaginary procenium arch for protection—“You’re there and I’m here.” Then, in spite of my fear of being so close to the audience in these explorations, I found myself having fun. Occasionally I used one of my own scripts as the basis for a program. We read scenes, we acted them out, we cast people as scenery, we ad-libbed our own dialogue. In effect, the audience and I co-authored our own new version of the story. I was inside the play along with my young audiences, a very good prospective for the playwright. And that’s where Dramatic Publishing found me when they acquired my output. By then I had hundreds of one-on-one programs under my belt, which gave me the opportunity to use this new prospective from the inside out in rewriting those scripts and, subsequently, a string of new plays. I still today ask friends and relatives to act as sounding boards, replacing my young audiences, for a play in progress. Helps me give voice to the play and every character in it.

Through all these opportunities I learned some rules, mostly the hard way: a) When in doubt, simplify! b) Best if you know how to end your play at the beginning. Sounds awfully basic, but its surprising how many plays that hold your interest go limp at the end. c) Construct the narrative so that the play progresses logically to the final mark. Reversals, coincidences and other surprises can happen along the way in a constructive manner and lead to a satisfying conclusion. They shouldn’t just be dropped into the play because they entertain on their own. Check out Ibsen. d) Make up a fairly long speech and then write different versions of it, one for each character, a good way to learn how to give a separate voice to each of them. e) Introduce your characters and show them a tree (Act I). Chase them up the tree and throw apples at them (Act II). When they have learned their lesson and promise to be good, let them come down (Act III), a process considered basic to a farce. I expect that if you knock them out of the tree with the apples and watch them wrestle over who got them up the tree in the first place, you’d have slapstick. If they sneak down when you are not looking and discover the true meaning of what being treed together was all about you’d be heading toward melodrama. What if they won’t come down and go mad up there because no one understands them? Tragedy.

And anguish and joy all the way.

William Glennon

William Glennon, (1923-2002) a native of Pennsylvania, received a bachelor’s degree from Duke University and went on to study theatre history at the University of Pittsburgh and art history at Bowdoin College. He had a long career in regional theatre and with stock companies, directing and acting in hundreds of plays. Eventually, he began to write his own. In Maine, he worked for several years on a special in-school program, exploring the use of theatre techniques in both learning and teaching throughout the state. For more than 25 years, he also was one of New England’s leading antique dealers, operating a seasonal business in Wiscasset, Maine.