|
One day my son, Sam, came home from Little League practice and announced that his coaches had provided the team with new strategy
for the upcoming play-offs. When one of the slower kids on the
team got on base, he’d receive a signal which meant that
upon reaching the next base, he should slide and pretend to be
injured. That way, the coaches could take him out of the game
and replace him with a faster runner. When Sam said, “Coach,
isn’t that cheating?” the coach replied, “No,
Sam, that’s called strategy.”
I was horrified. Is this how our children
are being trained to deal with competition? How many future
Enrons are brewing
on our Little League fields and in our school gyms under the
watchful eyes of over-zealous coaches? What about building character
and encouraging fair play? Or are such notions laughable in this
country at this point in history? At that moment I knew that
I had to write Rounding Third. But, as the play was
germinating in my head, I found myself thrust more intimately
into the fray,
first as an assistant coach and then as the coach of my son’s
team.
Philosophically, there was no question about where I stood.
Little League should be fun and the kids should be encouraged
to progress at their own speed, free of the overwhelming pressure
that awaits them in practically every aspect of their lives,
just around the corner.
And yet, when I found myself actually
coaching, I discovered that I wanted to win. I really wanted
to win. That voice I heard
bellowing across the diamond was, sadly, my own. Perhaps to rationalize
the extent of these feelings, I concluded that since we live
in such a highly competitive society, don’t we have an
obligation to teach our children how to succeed? Given that this
is the arena where they will be playing out their lives, shouldn’t
we equip them with the tools it takes to win?
By the time I wrote the play, I believed passionately in these
opposing points of view. We should protect and nurture our children
during this brief, precious time in their lives. And we should
teach them how to compete and how to win.
The two mismatched coaches in Rounding
Third, the “win
at all costs” Don and the “can’t we just have
fun?” Michael reflect this conflict. In my mind, they never
agree and they are both right. And as they struggle to communicate
their opposing philosophies to the team, they reveal who they
are. The play ultimately became an exploration of what it is
to be a man in this culture, how having children changes one's
self-perceptions, and what it truly means to succeed.
Now, when I hear Don’s exhortations to the team—which
are delivered directly to the audience—I hear the voices
of the many coaches I’ve had, starting with my first year
of Little League. And I hear my own voice, more impatiently than
I’d like, instructing, imploring, urging the team on to
victory.
And when I hear Michael encouraging the team after a tough loss
or fervently praying for his own hapless son to catch his first
fly ball of the season, I hear the hopefulness and the innocence
that seems both entirely appropriate and somewhat out of touch.
The horror I felt at hearing my son’s description of his
coach’s “strategy” provided a powerful trigger
to write a play. But writing the play was an act of discovery,
reflecting my own conflicts about how we live with some kind
of dignity and raise our children in a culture so ruthlessly
obsessed with material success.
|